MABO wrote:Very nice models on a really well arranged tabletop. (Even if I have to agree with the others concerning the bocage.)
Most of all one can see the big difference of equipment the opposing armies brings on the field... and in the air!
Yes, but the Germans could have won this game. It's not easy to attack a defended position.
You can (& we will) also have games with fully equipped German armoured panzer formations fighting the US & the 'Tommies'.
My main wargaming interests are (in order) Horse & Musket, Colonial & Ancients.
WW2 is a *totally* different game. I like it but don't necessarily love it. Can be a bit 'fiddly', IMO.
Differences include:
1. the empty battlefield. I like the colour & spectacle of massed troops, so WW2 loses here.
2. Spotting rules. You spend a lot of time working out who can see whom so you can shoot them.
3. Tech. Different guns with different abilities. The German Grille, for example, only fired HE & couldn't shoot at enemy armour. I found this out mid-game. Needless to say, my brave Grille was soon destroyed by a Firefly.
I should add my 2 opponents were ex-British & Australian army officers. They relish WW2 & have a skill level with modern tactics I do not have.
Still gaming is *always* a fun, social experience.
donald